Search This Blog

Sunday, March 26, 2017

The Prophet's Concept of Revolution



The Prophet's Concept of Revolution

What is the core concept of Prophet's revolution? If it were to be expressed in one word it would be "Oneness of God" as the pivotal point of religious belief about which Allama Iqbal has said: 
i.e., what was once a revolutionary concept has now been reduced to a topic of theological argument and dispute. Now let us look at the consequences and corollaries of this ideology based on the belief of the unity of God.

1. Man's Vicegerency rather than Man's Sovereignty
As I have said before, the very first distinctive feature of a revolutionary concept should be its capacity to fall like an axe on the foundations of prevailing system. The very basic principle embodied in the concept of "Tauheed" or "Oneness of Allah" is the Sovereignty of Allah (SWT). There is neither a human sovereign nor a nation on God's earth that can claim sovereignty. Allama Iqbal has expressed this forcefully thus: 
The concept of Tauheed negates the sovereignty of man in any and every form. Neither is human domination and sovereignty acceptable in the form of monarchy nor in the form of one nation ruling over another like the British when they ruled over us in the colonial days. And neither is the sovereignty of the masses in the shape of present day Democracy. 
The Sovereignty is exclusively for Allah The Almighty alone, and human beings can only act as His vicegerents on earth. All other forms of sovereignty are shirk and in the present age the concept of popular sovereignty is the worst form of shirk. The Legislator and Law-giver is only Allah (SWT) and the Prophet (SAW) is His Vicegerent. Now, tell me could there be a more revolutionary slogan than this?

2. Trusteeship instead of Ownership
The second logical consequence of Tauheed is the belief that Allah (SWT) is the Real Master of everything. This revolutionary slogan gives a fatal blow to the existing system of ideas and practices. No person owns anything, neither individually nor collectively or on a national level. Hence, both Communism and Capitalism are negated by this. Only Allah (SWT) is the True and Real Owner: whatever is in the heavens and in the earth is His. He is the only and Absolute Owner of everything. Human beings have only been made trustee of these things.
I do not even own my body; as a matter of truth it is Allah's. My hands and feet, my eyes, my brain has all been entrusted to me by Allah (SWT). If He has favoured me with a home, that too is Allah's. If He has given me offspring they too are His. Hence Absolute ownership is only for Him. We are not the owners or proprietors of anything so that we can go around doing anything that we wish to. The people of prophet Shoaib (AS) questioned him "O Shoaib (AS)! Does your prayer teach you that we should forsake all the Gods that our forefathers worshipped? And that we do not have any say as to how our wealth is spent?” The capitalist's point of view is that 'this is my wealth, I can spend it in any way I like, whether I run a gambling house or do interest-based trade with it or give it to someone on interest'. This is due to the fact that he considers himself to be the sole owner of the wealth. If you consider yourself merely a trustee, your viewpoint will be radically different. You will then use your hand as and where God has permitted you to use it. You will use your feet to tread on the path that God has marked and allowed for you. Similarly you will spend your wealth as God wants it to be spent and not in ways prohibited by Him.

3. Complete Social Equality
At the social level, belief in the Oneness of Allah (SWT) demands that by birth all human beings are equal; nobody is superior and no one is inferior. In this regard I have already mentioned the testimony of H.G. Wells that "Even though there have been a lot of sermons given on human fraternity, equality and freedom and we find a lot of such sermons by Jesus of Nazareth yet we have no option but to accept that it was only the Prophet (SAW) who for the first time in the entire history of mankind was able to create a society on the basis of the principles outlined in his sermons". If there is any superiority or inferiority in the Islamic society it is due to achievements and moral excellence that you have obtained on your own. If you acquire knowledge, you are superior and you will be respected. If you adopt the path of piety, you achieve a certain level of spirituality, now you will be respected. 
"The most honoured of you in the sight of Allah (SWT) is he who is the most righteous of you" 
(Al-Hujrat 49:13)
 
Essentially all human beings are equal. Be it Sudra or Brahmin, black or white, man or woman; there is no difference. The difference between man and woman is of an administrative role in the structure of family. Just as there is no difference, fundamentally on the human level, between the head of a department and the peon performing menial job. But due to the status and the associated responsibility the head of the department holds a superior position and the peon an inferior position. This is purely an administrative matter and does not make a subordinate less dignified as a human being than his boss. 
In our own country such human equality is generally seen amongst the Pakhtoons that everyone wears the same dress. Be it the wealthy and powerful landlord or his servant, both will be attired in the same dress and further they will sit together to dine. Arabs too believe in human equality. At lunch time a minister's guests, attendants and his drivers will eat with him at the same Dastar Khuan (a cloth spread on the ground and food served upon it). There is no difference between men and women at the human level; the difference is purely in terms of administrative roles. As stated in the Holy Quran :  

Men are the protectors and maintainers of women (Al-Nisa 4:34). 

That is to say, man has been accorded the position of the head of the family. But this does not mean that men are superior and women are inferior. It could be that a woman might, on the basis of her piety and morals, be superior to a billion men. There are innumerable men who would look at the preeminent spiritual status of Hazrat Maryam, Hazrat Asiya, Hazrat Khadija, Hazrat Aisha and Hazrat Fatima (RAA) as if they would look up at the sky. 

So these are the three consequences of the concept of Oneness or Tauheed at the political, economic and social level: Absolute Sovereignty of Allah, Absolute Ownership of Allah over all things and complete human equality. The Prophet (SAW) propagated the concept of Oneness of Allah (SWT) through the streets of Makkah, thus challenging radically the idolatry, social order and values of Makkan people. 

The Prophet (SAW) called out to the people: 'O ye people say, There is no God but Allah, you will attain prosperity'. In the initial phase of propagation and preaching he did not include the claim of his prophethood. He kept the entire emphasis on Oneness of God. For the propagation of this revolutionary concept the Prophet (SAW) utilized all the means available. He (SAW) went from door to door and called people towards the revolutionary message of the Oneness of Allah. Then twice he invited his clan members (of the Banu Hashim tribe) to feast and pleaded them to accept the Quranic teaching of Tauheed. Once the people simply did not listen to him and started making a commotion. 

The second time, they listened to him but remained quite as if they had been bitten by a snake. Out of the people present only Hazrat Ali (RAA) who had already accepted Islam stood up and gave consent to the Holy Prophet's mission. He said that 'even though my legs are lean, even though I am the youngest of all, even though my eyes ache yet I will support you'. And at this the entire congregation burst in a laughter saying that he [The Prophet (SAW)] is going to bring about a change with companions of this sort! Then the Prophet (SAW) was commanded:  

Declare openly what thou art commanded, and turn away from those who join false gods with Allah (Al-Hijr 15:94)

Thereupon, the Prophet (SAW) stood on the Mount Safa and raised the customary chant of important announcement. Then he went to the fairs like that of Ukaz and others and invited people to worship one God. This means that, all available means of communication were used. There were no loud speakers or televisions at that time. There was no electronic or print media. There were no printing presses, no books, no magazines, no newspapers. But whatever means or resources were available the Prophet (SAW) resorted to them for spreading the new revolutionary message.


To be continued ....





Sunday, March 19, 2017

The Revolution of the Prophet (SAW) - Pre-requisites and stages of the Revolutionary Process



The Pre requisites and Stages of the Revolutionary Process:

The only example of a Complete Revolution : The Revolution of the Holy Prophet (SAW).

A complete revolution is composed of 6 or 7 stages:

1. Revolutionary Ideology:
The first prerequisite of any revolution is a revolutionary ideology and a revolutionary philosophy that will hit like an axe on the pre-existing Politico-Socio-Economic system. And unless it has the bite to slash through the political system, slash through the economic system and slash through the social system it is not a revolutionary ideology; it is merely a sermon or an academic discourse. 
Secondly, if the revolutionary philosophy and ideology is new then it is an easy matter as regards its presentation. The new ideology will devise its own terminology and determine their meanings itself. But if it is an old ideology then its modern version will have to be presented and its explanation will have to be according to the modern terminology of the present era compatible with the concurrent level of knowledge and intellectual achievements. 
Then this ideology should be spread and made popular and for that all available means of communication of the present time should be utilized. Formerly one could walk through streets and bazaars gathering people and invite them to a cause or people would be invited for a dinner and the message would be conveyed to them. But now one can hold assemblies, address meetings and write books. Hence, along with the print media and the electronic media all means of communication available should be utilized for publicizing the revolutionary ideology.

2. Organization:
At the second stage, the people who accept the revolutionary ideology, should be organized as a collective entity. There are two conditions for the formation of this group or party. 
Firstly, it should be a well knit group with very strong discipline because when a confrontation occurs and you enter the field to put an end to the current system, the elite who have interests associated with the system, will stand up against you to crush you to ensure the continuity of the system. That is why you will require a military discipline against all odds. Merely a mob will not be able to stand against them, rather what will be required is a strong group which will be organized on the principle of "listen and obey" and their discipline should be such that:
Their' s not to reason why?
Their's but to do and die!
Secondly, the rank and cadre of its workers within the party would be determined on the basis of their loyalty to, and sacrifices for, the movement and not that a person enjoys a high rank in the party because he is a Brahman and if he is a Sudra he should be low on the hierarchy. If the latter is the case then the parry that we are talking bout is not a revolutionary organization. In a revolutionary organization the rank and status of a person is determined by the depth of his commitment, his association with the movement and loyalty. The extent of his sacrifices will also be taken into consideration. It is quite possible that a Sudra may reach the top cadre in a Communist party and a Brahman might be in the lower rank.

3. Training (Tarbiyyah)
The third stage is that of training the workers. At this stage the revolutionary ideology should not be allowed to lapse from the minds of the workers of the revolutionary organization for even a short span of time. For it is on this ideology that the whole revolutionary struggle depends. If the revolutionary ideology has unwaveringly and solidly taken root in the mind then the will to act will also be sustained but if that ideology were to fade away from the minds of the workers then the passion to act will also disappear and steam away. Alongside this they should be trained and inured to discipline so that they listen and obey. This is not an easy task; in fact it requires a great deal of fortitude and a strict regime of training and inurement. 
But the habituation of acceptance and obedience is not an easy task. One's own ego becomes a very potent and insurmountable obstacle in this process; in fact more than the ego it is the inflated egoism and extreme ego-centeredness that becomes a hurdle. 
The third target of revolutionary training will be to develop a zeal amongst the workers of the party to sacrifice everything for the sake of the revolutionary ideology. A revolution can not be brought about without this zeal and ardour. 
These three are the most fundamental and essential components of the revolutionary training process. Apart from these the fourth component of this training process for the revolution by means of which you wish to institute a particular system is additional. If the development of the spiritual facet of the human life is required in the ideology then the workers must be trained spiritually as well. Without the spiritual training of the workers how can spirituality permeate the revolution?

4. Passive Resistance
This is so to speak the 4th stage but is actually initiated alongside the first stage. Passive resistance means that the workers of the revolutionary movement should remain steadfast to their principle or stand, should not retreat from their stance but should not retaliate in any way to the violence and persecution they face. There is a very logical reason for this. First of all, conflict is created in a society by these revolutionary people. Otherwise the people are generally quite content and satisfied with the existing state of affairs. There were the rich and there were the poor; the poor accepted their lot in life as fate and the rich were living in the lap of luxury. The slave is fulfilling his duties, he knows that this is his fate, God has made him a slave. This is why Marx has said that religion is the opium of masses, because generally the masses remain contented for whatever their lot in life may be and do not seek to stir a ripple in the prevailing conditions. In other words, they do not rebel against the system. 
Hence, the scenario is much like your throwing a stone in a placid pond and creating a frenzy of waves where there were previously no unrest or disruption. Likewise, revolutionaries raise the voice of dissent against the established system and assert that this system is wrong and that it is an exploitative and repressive system. It is creating discrimination among the people. So who throws the stone? Obviously those who advocated the revolution! Now when the stone hits the water it is bound to generate a few waves. Hence, the waves that rise in society are a natural consequence of the revolutionary message. Even this reaction has different levels and stages. 

There are two very important stages in its retaliation. In the first stage an effort is focused on the character assassination of the person who spread the word about the revolution. In one way or another they try to tarnish his personality, to shatter his determination and to subdue his will power. Hence the main focus of violence and persecution becomes the person of the instigator and preacher of the revolution. Initially this persecution is verbal; that 'this person is mad, he is crazy, our system is just fine and has been in operation for centuries, it has been enforced since the days of our forefathers and he says that it is wrong. He has either lost his mind or is under the influence of some evil spirit'. If this verbal persecution is successful in crushing the preacher's will power then his determination will simply give away. Now no one else has to be troubled anymore. If the root, the origin and source, of a tree is cut off the tree will automatically wither away and die. But if the revolutionary preacher manages to stay, survives the attempts of character assassination and has not retaliated and the opponents see that the message is spreading and people are rallying around him then the second stage of the retaliation begins in which verbal persecution gives way to physical violence, torture and persecution. 
And this time the target or focus of persecution will not simply be the preacher hut all workers of the revolutionary movement particularly the weak and the youth from the respected families. Now they are physically abused, deprived of food and kicked out of their homes. They are jailed, murdered and made to face the firing squad where hundreds of them are killed. Now, at this point Passive Resistance is required so that all the physical violence and torture is tolerated without any retaliatory action. This is so because initially the number of followers of the revolutionary party is small. If this small group of followers is to retaliate with violence the established order would have the right to crush them, thereby finishing them off. But if they do not retaliate then they will still be made the targets of such violence and persecution but the establishment will not gain the right to crush them completely. In this manner they will gain time to act so that they can get their message across to the maximum number of people and expand their organizational base. They will only be able to confront the existing system if they have the power to do so and to acquire this power they need time which I call "buying time". Hence at this stage they should not even raise their hands in self-defense. This mode of action will have a very important consequence for the followers of the movement in that they will gain the sympathies of the public — the silent majority. 
You see in a society where there are Chaudhris, Sardars, Industrialists and Feudal Lords there is also the common man. The Chaudhris, Sardars, landlords, the capitalists and industrialists think that the revolutionary struggle is against them. That is not how the public views and understands the situation but they do not have the guts and courage to stand shoulder to shoulder with the revolutionaries; they cannot even speak up for them. These are the people whom we call the silent majority. The majority of the public is silent but they are not blind and deaf They can see what is happening; they question as to why are the revolutionaries being persecuted? Why are they being killed? Why are their houses being blown to bits? Why are their entire families being tortured? — They think about and ponder on what is their crime? Have they committed some kind of theft or dacoity? Nothing nothing at all! - they only believe in an ideology and wish to remove cruelty, injustice and repression from the society. Gradually, the common man starts feeling that this group is truly being subjected to unjustified and outright cruelty. Hence quite imperceptibly the sympathies of the people are turned towards the revolutionaries, thus exemplifying the wise adage: "He who conquers the hearts is the true conqueror".

5. Active Resistance
The fifth stage of the Revolutionary struggle is that of putting up active resistance. This is a time for making an extremely crucial decision and a test of the leadership's intelligence. It is very essential to determine the appropriate time for initiating this phase. If you are not fully prepared and you take the plunge prematurely you will be wiped out. On the other hand if in spite of being ready you delay in taking the step, you loose an opportunity. In other words - 'You have missed the bus'. Hence whether you loose the opportunity to initiate the forward action for the revolution or take the final initiative prematurely, in both cases you will be unsuccessful The decision to start active resistance should be made when it is felt that our numerical strength is enough. The meaning of enough will be different in different circumstances In a small country where the entire population consists of one billion people, perhaps fifty thousand people would be considered sufficient whereas in a country with a population of 15 billion people, 3 to 4 million trained and disciplined members would be required. 
Secondly, at this stage they should abide by the discipline to which they have been trained. They should be inured to the principle of 'listen and obey' that is to say, they will only act when commanded to act and will stop only when commanded to stop. They should not be the sort of revolutionaries who initially do not act at all and if they do act, they do not stop. A case in point would be the movement for the implementation of Shariah initiated by Sufi Mohammad Sahib in Malakand in which the followers fired bullets prior to any specific command from the leader. Then his followers had made pickets on the mountains and when their leader commanded them to come down the general consensus amongst the followers about him was that he had betrayed his principles. Hence this was not an organized group, it was not disciplined. In fact it was a mob that had responded to an emotional appeal. In this regard a third condition is that the revolutionary workers should be prepared to sacrifice their life and wealth for the sake of the mission. Only when these three conditions have been fulfilled the Revolutionary Movement can move forward from the stage of Passive Resistance into the stage of Active Resistance. 
Now you must be very clear as to what the term Active Resistance means. For explaining this I will give examples from outside the Islamic context for die time tang. I am not going to give any example from the seerah of the Prophet (SAW). This is because you can, by means of Modern terms and terminology, form and draw out a Sketch and then we shall add concrete details from the life of the Prophet (SAW) into this sketch. Let this be very clear that I claim no other source for gaming information about the correct methodology of bringing about a revolution than the life of the Prophet (SAW). 
Active Resistance is when you prod a weak and ailing nerve of the society even though you have neither out rightly or directly challenged it and neither have you given an ultimatum. For instance it was Gandhi who for the first time raised the slogan of "non-violent non-cooperation against the British rulers. In fact Gandhi and his followers maintained that we will not indulge in violence or killing and carnage but we will boycott and not use the cloth made in the mills of England. Instead we will use our spinning wheels, weave our own cotton, prepare khaddar and wear that. They declared the spinning wheel to be their national symbol. Just think about a nation and an organized party within that nation that it declared the spinning wheel their symbol in the 20th century. Now can there be a law that you have to wear English cloth only? And did they harm anyone? Nobody's life or wealth was harmed but it created a frenzy in the corridors of power because the mills in Manchester started closing down. India was a huge market for British textile industry and there was a heavy trade of cotton, woolen cloth and Muslin from England here. But now it was only khaddar that was being used by the nationalist protestors. This was the first step of Active Resistance against the British. The British rightly guessed from this step taken by Gandhi that something serious was about to happen. The second step taken by this party at this stage was the Civil Disobedience Movement based on non-violence: 'we will not perpetrate violence, we will not indulge in killing and plunder but will break the law'. And now consider the manner in which the laws were broken. They argued: 'The sea belongs to the Parmatma, the Parmatma has created salt in the sea, we are simply going to extract the salt from the sea created by the Parmatma. We have not said anything derogatory to anyone'. But covertly and indirectly they had actually challenged the British Government's Taxation Policy because there was an excise duty levied on salt. Hence batons were charged, prominent leaders were beaten up and injured and jails were crammed on a large scale even though the members of the party themselves did not resort to violence of any kind.

6. Armed Conflict
After the stage of Active resistance, the sixth and last stage will be that of direct confrontation. That is there will be an actual physical clash between the defenders of the existing system and the revolutionaries. Because when you have started Active Resistance you have basically challenged the whole system. Hence, the dominant repressive system and its custodians will go all out in taking measures to crush the followers of the revolutionary movement. It is at this stage that the revolutionary movement will be put to the test. If the movement has prepared properly for the revolution, the organization and training of the members was done along the right lines and steps were taken timely then this movement will be successful. And if steps were taken in the context of Active Resistance without prior preparation: neither is there a sufficient number of the followers nor had they been trained or groomed to the discipline of "listen and obey"; the movement will as a natural consequence fail. In other words after the clash it will be either the throne or the bier, there is no middle position. There can be many forms of this conflict, I will mention these later. If you would like to understand in a poetic form whatever I have said so far with regard to the methodology of revolution, you can understand this by means of the following Persian couplet of Allama Iqbal : 
In this couplet Allama Iqbal is explaining a dialogue (in Paradise Lost) with God and presenting his viewpoint. He imagines that, God asked me 'O! Iqbal, is the world to which I have sent you agreeable to you? Do you like it? I replied, "No, I do not like it"! Over here there is cruelty, the poor and the deprived are being crushed. Here the capitalist sucks the blood running in the sinews of the labourer. And due to the injustice of the feudal landlord the harvest of the farmer is perishing. His children are hungry and his family is not benefiting from whatever he has harvested. This is an epic poem by Allama Iqbal in which he has raised the cry for a revolution. So, Iqbal says when I replied that I do not like this world of yours, it is not favourable to me; Allah (SWT) then decreed "Barham-zan" i.e. Ravage it! Destroy it! Bring a revolution here! 
Now, what should be the methodology of this revolution? That question was also addressed by Iqbal. He has answered this question in the following couplet in which he has mentioned four stages in the first line and two stages in the second line of this couplet: 

First adopt the mode of life of an Islamic ascetic and derwesh and continue doing your work. Continue the mission of inviting to and propagating the message. If somebody calls you insane or if somebody tries to disgrace or humiliate you, respond to it gracefully with a prayer. This is saintliness (derweshi). That is to say, you are like the monks of Buddhism. You are being thrashed but you are not retaliating. And when you are ready i.e. you have a sufficient number of followers, the training has been under-taken properly, you have been habituated to obey the discipline of the organization and are ready to sacrifice everything, then this is the time to go ahead for a head-on collision with the bastion of power. A revolution cannot come about without this clash and confrontation. Mere sermonizing does not bring about revolutions. In the course of this confrontation lives will be lost, blood will be spilt. Revolutions do not come about serenely and placidly. The six stages that I have explained above must be traversed for the completion of a revolution in any country.

7. Outward expansion of the Revolution
Apart from the above mentioned 6 stages there is a seventh stage of revolution and it is a litmus test for a true revolution. A true revolution is never limited to the geographical, national or governmental borders. This is so because if the revolutionary ideology is powerful, convincing, strong, logical and rational, it will definitely succeed in gripping the hearts and minds of people everywhere. Hence, a true revolution will always be exported. It can never stay within the geographical boundaries of a particular region or country. 
This is the blue-print of the revolutionary process I have gleaned from the life trajectory of the Prophet (SAW), and presented before you in very general terms, without using any technical terms. Now I will place in this theoretical gestalt the concrete details and specifics from the seerah of the Prophet (SAW). 
To be continued ....




Sunday, March 12, 2017

Lexical & Connotative meaning of the word Revolution



Lexical and connotative meaning of the word Revolution

After this introductory discussion, it is essential for us to understand what the term revolution means. In the literal sense it means change. Hence we can use this term in conjunction with any other word for instance educational revolution, cultural revolution, scientific revolution, military revolution. But when it comes to the general and broad meaning of the word Revolution, there is absolutely no margin for such limited application. Rather, connotatively it refers to a fundamental change in the political, economic and social system of a country.

In today's world human life is generally considered to be divided into two spheres. One of these spheres pertains to the individual life of the person whereas the second sphere encapsulates the collective matters. Amongst these the first mentioned is the sphere of religion which consists of metaphysical beliefs or dogmas, rituals and social customs. Today an individual is considered free to follow his will in these matters the world over. Hence a person has the freedom to have whatever dogmas he wishes to entertain: whether he wishes to worship one God or a hundred or a thousand or adopt atheism or to perform whatever religious rituals he wishes to perform. He is free if he wishes to become an ascetic, or prostrate before statues or worship one unseen God. He has total freedom to follow whatever religious rituals he wishes to. He can fast, offer prayer, go to a temple or church. Likewise he has the freedom to perform social customs. He can either get married by contracting a Nikah (Muslim marriage) or perform 'phairay' (Hindu marriage). A person who has died can either be buried or burnt on the pyre in accordance with his belief and wish.

The second sphere pertains to civilization, culture, state and politics that pertains to the social system which is comprised of the Politico-Socio-Economic system. It has nothing to do with the religious sphere of life. This is called secularism. It should be clear that secularism does not mean irreligiosity but it is multi-religiousness based on the rule of 'ladeenyat' (all faiths at the level of religion, but no 'deen'). In secularism all religions are acceptable. Even George W. Bush says that "We are ready to tolerate Islam", Islam as a religion is perfectly acceptable to them and they have no objection to it. They say that the Muslims in America bought Churches and Synagogues and converted them into mosques and that they never objected. The Muslims converted a large number of Afro- Americans and quite a few Whites to Islam and they never objected for the simple reason that they have no conflict with Islam as a religion. But it is Islam as a way of life that they cannot allow to flourish. It is this facet of Islam that they term fundamentalism and since the methodology adopted by some fundamentalists has been given the label of Terrorism therefore they equate Fundamentalism with Terrorism. Hence sometime they speak of a "War against Terrorism" and at other times they speak of a "War against Fundamentalism". In reality this is a war against Islam as a 'deen' or way of life and not against the dogmas, Ibadaat (prayers) and social rituals of Islam.

In modern terminology the term Revolution refers to change in the second sphere i.e. the social or corporate system. The greatest change in the field of religion cannot be termed a revolution. This is a very important point, kindly do understand this very clearly. The greatest religious change in the history of mankind was brought about in the year 300 C.E. when the Emperor of Rome Constantine the Great adopted Christianity and thereby all his subjects did too. Never had such a mass conversion taken place in religious history. When this event occurred the Roman Empire was spread over 3 continents; the whole of North Africa, Eastern Europe and Western Asia always have praise for you but true praise is the praise coming from an enemy's tongue. If Richard the Lion- Hearted praised Salahuddin Ayubi it was so because Salahuddin Ayubi was truly a great personality. M.N. Roy, a Bengali Hindu and member of the International Communist Organization delivered a lecture in Bradlaugh Hall, Lahore in 1920 C.E on the topic of "The Historical Role of Islam" and said that there was absolutely no doubt that the greatest revolution in the history of mankind was the one brought about by the Prophet (SAW). It is to be kept in mind that he was not a follower of Islam; in fact he was a Bengali Hindu and a leading communist but he acknowledges this fact openly and in unambiguous words.

This was in 1920 C.E that is 20 years after the beginning of the century. Let us now come to 1980 C.E, 20 years before the end of the century; Dr. Michael Hart wrote the book "The 100" in which he has selected and graded the 100 most influential people in the 5000 year known history of mankind because they played a pivotal role in turning the tide of human civilization. In this gradation he has placed the Prophet (SAW) at number one. Dr. Michael Hart is a Christian by religion and, according to my information, is alive and residing in Manhattan. His book widely spread in the world but very soon after publication it became very rare and the general opinion is that the disappearance of the book was due to a conspiracy because he placed Jesus Christ, whom the Christians consider to be God's only son, at number three whereas he placed Prophet Muhammad at number ONE. This was something that was not acceptable or palatable to the Christian world. He writes (the opening sentence): 
"MY CHOICE OF MUHAMMAD (SAW) TO LEAD THE LIST OF THE WORLD'S MOST INFLUENTIAL PERSONS MAY SURPRISE SOME READERS AND MAY BE QUESTIONED BY OTHERS, BUT HE WAS THE ONLY IN HISTORY WHO WAS SUPREMELY SUCCESSFUL ON BOTH THE RELIGIOUS AND SECULAR LEVELS."

And concluded the biography with the words:
"IT IS THIS UNPARALLELED COMBINATION OF SECULAR AND RELIGIOUS INFLUENCE WHICH I FEEL ENTITLES MUHAMMAD TO BE CONSIDERED THE MOST INFLUENTIAL SINGLE FIGURE IN HUMAN HISTORY."

According to Dr. Michael Hart human life can be divided into two distinct and disparate spheres. One sphere is that of religion, morality and spirituality whereas the other comprises the aspects of culture, civilization, politics and sociology and according to his candid assessment, the only person supremely successful in both these spheres is the Prophet (SAW). Generally people who are believed to be great are considered so due to their unsurpassed performance in any one field or facet of life. Gautama Buddha is known for his piety and self mortification. In terms of moral uplift and sermonizing Jesus Christ is unsurpassed but he has made no contribution in the domain of governance or politics. In terms of conquests and war adventures Alexander the Great is unsurpassed, so are Attila the Hun, Genghis Khan, Akbar the Great and many other great conquerors. But did they have any position in the fields of religion, morals or spirituality? One cannot even give them a zero, rather we would have to resort to negative marking. In the entire history of mankind there is only one man who is most successful and unsurpassed in both these spheres and that is the Prophet of Islam Muhammad(SAW).

The third testimony from amongst the testimonies of non-Muslims which I usually quote is that of H.G Wells. But the text that I quote from his book for this purpose has been removed from the latest editions of his work 'A Concise History of the World'. Truly no greater tribute could be paid by an enemy because H.G. Wells was actually a staunch opponent and enemy of Islam. He has made more vitriolic and more vile remarks about the holy person of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) than those made by Salman Rushdie and Tasleema Nasreen two unfortunate born Muslims. But when he refers to the following quote from the Last Sermon of the Prophet (SAW) he is forced to admit and bow down to pay tribute to the greatness of the Prophet (SAW). In the Last Pilgrimage Sermon the Prophet (SAW) said: 
"O people! Truly there is only one God and you are all the offspring of Adam (AS). Beware! no Arab is superior to a non-Arab and no non-Arab is superior to an Arab. Neither is a white man superior to a black man nor is a black man superior to a white man. True superiority is due only to a God-fearing person.” 
Even though H.G. Wells is a Christian but after quoting from the Last Sermon he is forced to admit that "Even though there have been a lot of sermons given on human fraternity, equality and freedom and we find a great number of such sermons by Jesus of Nazareth yet we have no option but to accept that it was only Muhammad (SAW) who for the first time in the entire history of mankind was able to create a society on the basis of the lofty principles outlined in his sermons"

Hence even the testimony of the enemies of Islam and non-Muslims points to the ultimate verdict and proves that the greatest revolution in the history of mankind was the one brought about by the Prophet Muhammad (SAW). If one were to compare the Revolution brought about by the Prophet (SAW) to the French Revolution and the Bolshevik Revolution one can see that in the French Revolution only the political system was changed and in the Bolshevik Revolution only the economic system underwent a change — but in the Revolution of the Prophet (SAW) everything changed — religion, beliefs, rituals, the political system, the economic system, the social life. Nothing remained as it had been. I invite you to find a single aspect of life that was not affected and changed. 

A nation where literate people could be easily counted on one's fingers was transformed by the revolution of the Prophet (SAW) into the world leaders in the field of knowledge and sciences. The Arabs discovered new fields of knowledge, procured knowledge from all over the world from India to Greece, developed it further and placed it before the world. All the above mentioned points prove that the most comprehensive, the most deep and the most profound revolution was the revolution of the Prophet (SAW). No other revolution can stand up to it in comparison. All other revolutions were partial. In all other revolutions you can see that the visionaries of the revolution and the thinkers were a separate group of people and those who actually brought about the revolution were another group. The book Das Capital was written by Marx and Angels in Germany and England but the Marxist Revolution did not occur in any part of Germany or England. It was in another distant place, in Russia, that a revolution based on the revolutionary ideas outlined in Das Capital was brought about by the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks and it so happened that Lenin appeared on the scene at the right time. Neither Marx nor Angels had any role in bringing about this revolution. Hence the visionaries and thinkers of the revolution were not the ones to bring about the revolution and vice versa. Similarly, it was men of letters like Voltaire and Roseau who imparted a vision, the thought of liberty, freedom and democracy but they too were just intellectuals and desk workers; they could only write books not lead men in the field. Hence it was the dissolute part of the population that brought about the revolution in France. This is the reason why the French Revolution was such a bloody revolution. There was nobody to control it and a mob can get away with anything that it does.

Now in contrast, let us look at the revolution brought about by the Prophet (SAW) which from the beginning to the end was masterminded only under the leadership of one person. Here we see the Prophet (SAW) simultaneously preaching in the streets of Makkah, going from one street to the other inviting people to enter the fold of Islam and preaching the fundamental tenets of Islam. Some people would call him mad and some would call him a poet. The Prophet (SAW) was tolerating all this. The Prophet (SAW) never turned around and called them mad. But then you have seen the same person leading his men in the battlefield in the Battle of Badr. Is there any comparable precedent and example in history? I will once again repeat the words of Dr. Michael Hart that "He is the only, the only, the only person". We see him changing from a person going from street to street inviting people to accept a new religion to the role of a commander of an army in the battlefield. Is there any relation between these two or are they poles apart and contradictory?

In this regard, kindly note a very important point. Toynbee, a British philosopher of history in the past century has made a statement steeped in poison about the Prophet (SAW) that "Muhammad failed as a prophet, but succeeded as a statesman". As an elucidation of Toynbee’s statement, Professor Dr. Montgomery Watts wrote two books: Muhammad at Mecca and Muhammad at Medina. In Muhammad at Medina he has seemingly used all possible laudatory words in the superlative degree to describe the person and character of the Prophet (SAW). But in fact he has tried to highlight a contrast that Muhammad (SAW) of Makkah was an embodiment of peace and compassion where as Muhammad (SAW) of Madina was quite different. Taken in by these apparently laudatory words the late President Zia-ul-Haq invited Montgomery Watt as the chief speaker to the Central Seerah Conference in 1983 C.E. He had absolutely no idea in what a cunning and conniving manner he had tried to show a contrast in the seerah of the Prophet (SAW) and that these two Muhammads (SAW) are different from one another. Their attitudes and policies are totally different and at odds with each other.

Even though these writers and scholars do not believe that the Prophet (SAW) is a messenger of God, when they see the life of the Prophet (SAW) in Makkah they do accept that his life does bear some resemblance to the life of prophets. The Prophet Muhammad (SAW) appears like Jesus Christ who traveled and preached and the Prophet (SAW) just like Jesus Christ tolerated everything that anybody said and did not retaliate at all. Hence for them this presents a pattern somewhat similar to that of Prophets in which according to them the Prophet (SAW) failed (God forbid). According to their perception the Prophet had to flee from Makkah in order to save his life. They term Hijrah a "flight". Whereas flight usually is due to fear, Hijrah was not due to fear but it was a strategy the aim of which was to search for an alternative base. Anyway these orientlists see a totally different and new Prophet Muhammad settled in Madina, one who is a wise and sagacious politician, who is the ruler of a state and the commander of an army. Here we see the Prophet entering into treaties with the Jews. Here the marvels of his sagacity, statesmanship and acute political vision become visible. For them this is the split or contradiction in the life of the Prophet (SAW).

I am referring to all this because the Holy Prophet's life truly represents a contrast in the sense that he not only initiated a revolutionary message but also successfully saw it through to its final stage. Among the revolutions of the world no other revolution reached its culmination within the life span of one individual. In fact, the thinkers and visionaries were long dead and gone and it was much later when their thoughts and visions started burgeoning and on the basis of these a revolution would come about somewhere. Whereas the revolution of the Prophet (SAW) is unique and unsurpassed in that within the life span of one individual, in a duration of 23 years, all the stages A-Z of a revolution were accomplished.

From all this I derive the conclusion that today if a student of Social Sciences i.e. Sociology or Political Science with all sincerity wishes to derive the correct methodology of bringing about a revolution, he can get complete guidance only from the life of the Prophet (SAW). The lives of Marx, Angels, Lenin or Voltaire can provide absolutely no guidance in this regard. This in effect means that for the entire world there is only one source for the methodology of a revolution and that is the life of the Prophet (SAW). Hence my source for whatever I am saying about the methodology of revolution is only the biography of the Prophet (SAW). Without using the Islamic terms like Deen (way of life), Islam, Iman (belief), Jihad (strife) and Qital (armed combat) I would like to acquaint you with the stages of Revolution. The reason for this being that during the period of our decline these terms have acquired limited and distorted meanings and whenever we use any of these terms it is these limited and distorted meanings that come to mind. Hence if we are to avoid these terms and in their stead use modern terminology it will be easier to understand an outline or blue print of what a revolution is? It will be appropriate later on to add to this sketch the parallels from the terminology of Quran and Hadith, the Seerat-un-Nabi (life of the Prophet (SAW)) and the events described therein .



To be continued ....




Labels

'Ad (2) 'Itikaf (1) #chosen (3) #Islamic Public Order (3) #manners (3) 1000 (1) 2012 (2) 9/11 WTC (1) abandon (4) Abraham (17) abrogation (7) Abstinence (3) Abul Kalam Azad (1) Abundance (2) Abyssinia (1) accent (4) acceptance (4) Account (15) act (10) active (6) Adam (12) Addiction (6) adhan (5) Admonish (16) Adornment (2) advice (1) Afghanistan (2) Africa (3) age (3) Agra (1) Ahmad (9) Ahzab (1) Al Haram (3) Alaq (1) Albania (1) alcohol (2) Aleppo (2) Algeria (2) Allah (29) Allegiance (22) allegorical (3) alms (2) Alphabets (3) Ameer (7) Anfaal (1) Angels (21) Anger (4) Animal (7) Ankaboot (1) Ansaar (4) Ant (1) anti-Christ (1) antipathy (1) anxiety (1) appreciation (1) Aqabah (3) Aqsa (3) Arab Spring (5) Arabic (29) Arabs (20) Arafat (2) Argentina (1) argument (7) ark (1) Armenia (1) army (5) arrogant (7) Ascent (7) ascetic (1) asceticism (1) Ashgabat (2) aspects (2) aspire (2) astray (2) Asunder (3) athar (1) attitude (11) Attributes (6) Austin (1) Australia (1) Austria (1) authority (13) avoid (2) Ayah (15) Ayatul Kursi (2) Azerbaijan (1) Baby (3) backbiting (1) Badr (7) Baghdad (2) Bahrain (1) Bai’yah (20) Bai'yah al Ridwan (1) Balance (10) Bangladesh (4) Bani Isra'el (5) banking (3) Baqarah (2) bargain (2) barter system (1) Basanta Coomar Bose (1) basirah (1) battle (9) beast of the earth (9) Beautiful (6) Bee (1) beg (1) begotten (1) Behaviour (9) Beijing (1) Beirut (1) Belgium (1) Belief (24) Believe (7) Believer (27) benedictions (1) Benin (1) Berlin (1) beware (1) bible (13) Big (1) Birds (2) black sea (1) blame (4) blasphemy (2) Blessings (7) blood (3) boasting (1) Bodley (1) body (10) Bolshevik (2) bondsman (3) Book (17) Bosnia (2) Bosworth (1) Botswana (1) Brazil (1) breast (1) British (2) brotherhood (11) Brunei (1) Bukhara (1) Bukhari (2) Bulgaria (1) burden (1) Burkina Faso (1) Burma (1) business (2) byzantine (2) Caesar (1) Cairo (1) Calf (3) Caliphate (9) call for prayer (4) Calling (14) camel (2) Canada (1) capitalism (5) caravan (3) Caring (2) Cattle (7) Cave (2) Chad (1) challenge (7) change (8) character (20) Charity (21) Charles Francis Potter (1) children (16) Chile (1) China (1) choice (20) Christian (39) circumcision (1) circumstances (8) City (5) civilization (11) cleanliness (1) Clear (4) Cleaving (1) Clot (1) clothes (7) collective (11) colonialism (5) Color (1) Colors (1) Comer (2) commander (3) Commandments (31) commitment (8) communicate (3) Community (23) Companions (45) comprehensive (9) conduct (15) Confederates (3) confliction (4) confront (4) confusion (5) congregation (4) conjecture (1) Conquer (1) consciousness (12) Consequences (21) consistent (1) Constantine (1) Constantinople (5) constitution (11) Consultations (2) contact (1) contentment (3) context (4) contract (1) contradiction (7) Control (8) convey (6) conviction (13) copper (1) Corrupt (3) Corruption (8) courage (7) courtesy (1) Covenant (10) covetousness (2) Creation (36) Criterion (13) Crucifixion (1) crusades (6) Crystal (1) cult (2) cupping (1) currency (3) Curse (11) Curved (1) Cyprus (1) Da'wah (37) daawah (1) Daily (3) dajjal (34) Dakha (1) Damascus (6) David (5) Dawn (5) Dawud (3) Day (26) Day Break (1) De Lacy O'Leary (1) Deal (2) Death (39) debts (3) deception (8) declaration (3) Decree (3) Deeds (40) Deen (88) defense (4) delegation (1) Delhi (1) delusion (1) Demand (4) democracy (6) Deny (6) dereliction (1) derision (2) descent (2) Desire (30) destiny (3) destruction (5) devotion (4) Dhūl Qarnain (6) differences (1) dimension (8) dinar (1) dirham (1) Disbeliever (49) discipline (14) diseases (35) displeasure (6) disposal (1) Disputation (1) Distinguish (3) divine (9) Divorce (12) Diwand Chand Sharma (1) doctrines (3) dogma (3) Dominion (6) Doomsday (17) doubt (4) Dr Zakir Naik (1) dreams (3) drink (3) Dua (1) Dubai (2) Dubious (1) Duties (29) Earth (24) Earthquake (2) easy (10) economy (13) education (9) egotism (3) Egypt (8) Eid (10) Eid ul Adha (3) Eid ul Fitr (1) elections (10) Elephant (1) Elevation (1) eloquence (4) emotions (6) emphasis (2) employee (1) Emulous (1) end times (8) Enemy (16) energy (1) England (1) enjoining good and forbidding evil (14) enlightenment (5) environment (4) envy (3) epistemology (9) epoch (2) eschatology (4) establish (43) Etiquette (3) Euphrates (2) European (14) Event (7) Everlasting (1) Evidence (15) evil (16) exalted (1) Examine (4) Example (22) excellence (1) excess (1) excuses (3) exemption (1) exhorting (6) Expansion (1) expedition (4) explanation (10) exploitation (6) fair market (1) Faith (46) Family (22) fantasizing (2) FAQ on Islam (58) Fasting (32) father (5) Fatiha (2) fear (20) feminism (4) Fig (2) fight (7) firasa (1) fire (10) firm (3) fitnah (2) Fitra (2) Flock (1) flogging (3) floor (1) fo (1) Folded (1) followers (10) Food (15) forbearance (1) forbidden (4) Fore (1) forgiveness (14) Forgiver (8) Fornication (6) Forth (1) foundation (3) France (2) Fraud (5) freedom (12) french (1) Friday (1) Friend (4) Frown (1) function (4) fundamental (6) Gabriel (11) Gain (1) gambling (1) Gathering (5) gaze (1) generosity (1) Genie (1) Georgia (1) Germany (2) Ghana (1) Ghazali (1) Gibbon (2) Glory (5) gluttony (1) goal (24) God (12) Gog Magog (13) Gold (4) good (10) Gospel (2) Gracious (3) gratitude (11) grave (2) Great (11) Greece (1) greed (2) Greeks (1) grief (3) Groups (11) guard (5) guests (1) Guidance (82) guilt (1) Guinea (1) Gujrat (1) H.A.R. Gibb (1) habits (1) Hadeed (2) Hadith (29) Hafiz (1) Hajj (13) halaal (4) haraam (5) harm (2) hatred (2) haughty (3) healing (5) health (11) Heart (74) Heaven (15) Hebrew (2) heed (2) heedlessness (5) Hegel (1) Heights (1) Hejaz (1) Hell (24) Help (7) Heraclius (4) Hercegowina (2) Hereafter (64) hermit (1) High (1) Hijab (10) Hijrah (14) hijri (1) Hills (1) Hindu (17) history (55) Hizbullah (2) home (2) Homosexuals (9) Homs (2) Honey (1) hoor (1) hope (4) horns (1) Horse (1) Hour (3) House (4) hub (1) Hud (2) Hudaibiya (5) humble (10) humility (2) Hungary (1) Hungry (2) hurt (1) husband (10) Hyderabad (1) Hypocrites (14) Ibadah (2) Iblees (4) Ibrahim (14) Iddat (1) ideal (4) idol (4) ignorance (11) Ihsaan (10) Illinois (1) Illusion (2) Iman (12) Immigrants (4) imperative (9) imperialism (3) implications (6) Imran (5) in the cause of Allah (6) India (8) Indonesia (2) Inevitable (6) influence (8) Inheritance (7) iniquity (2) Innocence of Muslims (6) innovation (1) insidious (1) insight (36) inspiration (2) intellect (17) Intention (8) interest (15) interpretation (27) intoxicants (4) intuition (4) inviting (7) Iqbal (7) Iqra (2) Iran (8) Iraq (5) Iron (2) Isfahan (2) Ishaq (4) Islam (265) Islamic Architecture (105) Islamic Party (23) Islamic Public Order (6) Islamic State (27) Ismail (4) isolation (2) Isra (10) Israel (19) Israr (11) Istanbul (5) ita`ah (1) Italy (1) jacob (1) Jafar al Tayyar (2) Jakarta (2) Jama'ah (8) Japan (1) jasad (18) jealousy (1) Jerusalem (18) Jesus (35) Jews (28) Jihaad (23) Jinn (13) John (4) Jonah (3) Jordan (1) Joseph (5) Journey (6) Judaism (1) Judgement (59) Jumu'ah (3) Justice (59) Kaaba (3) Kahf (7) Karachi (1) Kazakhstan (1) Kazan (1) Kenya (1) Kerala (1) Key (5) Khilafah (7) Khizr (6) Khorasan (1) Khosrow (1) Khyber (2) Kindness (10) King (11) Kneeling (1) knife (1) Knowledge (75) Kosovo (1) Kuala Lumpur (1) Kuala Terengganu (1) Kurd (1) Kuwait (1) Kyrgyzstan (2) Lahore (1) Laila-tul-Qadr (2) Lamartine (1) language (19) Las Vegas (1) Last Day (17) Law (20) lazy (1) leader (30) learn (4) Lebanon (1) legal (11) Lesson (8) Letters (5) Li'an (1) Liberia (1) Liberty (4) Libya (1) lie (3) life (47) Light (26) lineage (1) link (2) listen (6) listen and obey (8) logical (6) London (1) Loss (4) lost (1) Lot (6) love (16) loyalty (2) lust (4) Macedonia (1) Madagascar (1) Madinah (17) Magician (1) Magnet (1) Mahatma Gandhi (1) Mahram (4) Maidah (1) Makkah (20) Malawi (1) Malaysia (7) Malcolm-X (3) Mali (1) malice (1) Man (7) Mankind (14) manners (5) Marriage (22) Martyr (5) Mary (8) Maryam (7) Masjid (100) Masjid Al Nabawi (3) master (1) materialism (8) Mauritius (1) meaning (15) Meat (3) media (12) mediocre (1) meditate (3) melodious (4) memorizing (5) menstruation (2) Merciful (17) Messengers (35) metaphysical (9) methodology (70) Mexico (1) Mi'raj (9) Migrate (9) minister (1) Miracle (10) Mirage (2) Miraj (1) misconception (15) miserliness (2) Mission (12) mistake (5) mock (3) Model (10) modesty (13) Monasticism (3) Monger (1) Mongolia (1) monotheism (3) Months (8) Monuments (11) Moon (15) morality (22) Morocco (2) Moses (7) Mosque (96) Mother (6) Mount Sinai (1) Mountain (5) movement (10) Mozambique (1) Mubah (1) Mubarak (9) Muhajir (1) Muhammad (78) Mumbai (1) Mumtahana (1) munafiqun (1) Muqatta’āt (2) murder (2) Musa (18) Muscat (1) Muslim (223) Muslim Village (4) Mutashābihāt (4) Mutual (1) mystery (57) myth (2) nafs (8) Nairobi (1) Najm (1) name (5) Narration (5) nation (11) nature (6) nazar (2) negligence (5) negus (1) neighbour (3) Netherlands (1) network (1) News (1) Niger (1) Nigeria (1) Night (14) Night Journey (4) Night of Power (2) Night Vigil (3) Nikah (2) Nisa (2) Noah (10) Non-Muslim (5) Noon (1) Noor (3) Numbers (116) Oath (5) Obedience (34) Objective (36) Obligation (87) Ocean (8) Oman (3) One (15) only (2) Opening (3) opinion (7) oppression (27) order (8) organization (21) Origin (5) Orphans (5) orthodox (4) ostentation (5) Ottoman (2) Overwhelming (1) owe (24) pact (2) Pakistan (8) Palestine (5) Palm (1) Panorama (1) paper money (4) Paradise (19) Paraguay (1) Parents (13) partial (1) party (4) Passive (2) path (2) Patience (17) Peace (14) Pearls (5) Pen (2) People (7) perception (21) permissible (6) persecution (5) Perseverance (11) Persia (2) perspective (11) pervert (1) Pharaoh (20) phenomenon (1) Philippines (1) Philosophy (29) physical (5) Piety (5) Pilgrimage (5) pillars (3) plan (23) Pledge (24) Poets (2) poison (1) political (24) polygyny (2) Ponder (19) poor (5) pope (1) Pornography (1) poverty (2) power (25) Practice (30) Prayer (36) Pre-requisites (8) preaching (18) pride (3) principles (5) priorities (9) Prisoner (4) Prizren (1) problem (6) Proclaim (23) Prohibition (23) promise (2) propagating (9) property (7) prophecy (12) Prophets (86) Prostration (8) protection (11) Protest (4) provisions (5) prying (1) Psalms (1) Psychology (13) Pulsiraat (1) Punishment (37) Purity (39) purpose (16) Qadr (3) Qaf (1) Qaroon (1) Qatar (1) Qiblah (8) Qiyam-ul-lail (1) Qiyamah (1) Qualities (2) Queen (1) question (63) Quill (1) Qur'an (285) Quraish (5) Qurbani (2) rabbis (1) Rajab (2) Ramadhan (22) rancor (4) Ranged (1) Ranks (2) ransom (2) rapes (4) Razi (1) Read (15) Reality (20) realization (4) Rebellion (4) Recitation (40) reflection (20) reformers (4) refuge (9) relatives (10) Reliance (3) religion (79) relying (2) remedies (5) Remember (27) Renaissance (14) Repent (25) resistance (5) responsibilities (23) Resurrection (27) retribution (5) Reveal (11) Revelation (52) reverence (8) revive (4) Revolution (35) Reward (30) rhythmic (2) Riba (17) Right Way (20) Righteousness (12) rights (19) rituals (4) River (2) Rocky (1) Romania (1) Romans (3) Rome (1) Rope (11) Row (1) Rūm (1) rumi (1) Run (2) Ruqayyiah (1) Russia (4) Sacrifice (19) Safiya (1) Sajdah (1) Salahuddin (1) Salat (13) Saleh (2) Salvation (16) Samarkand (1) Sand (1) sarcastic (1) Sarojini Naidu (1) Satan (18) satisfaction (2) Satr (1) Saudi Arabia (18) Saul (1) Scandal (2) Scatter (1) scholars (24) science (21) sclerosis (1) scriptures (28) Sea of Galilee (1) seal (2) seclusion (1) Secret (2) Sects (14) secular (30) security (7) Seek (5) Seerah (9) self (21) self restraint (2) Seljuk (1) Senegal (1) Sense (7) Sent (1) Seoul (1) sequence (2) Serbia (1) sermon (9) servant (7) sex (21) Shaban (2) shade (2) Shah Waliullah (2) Shahadah (2) Shaheed (2) Shaikh-ul-Hind (1) Shaitan (17) shame (3) Shariah (19) Sheba (2) sheep (1) shepherd (2) shirk (19) Shrik (7) Shuaib (2) shura (1) Sign (46) significance (19) silence (1) similitude (4) sin (7) sincerity (2) Singapore (1) sinkings (2) Sins (14) Slanderer (2) slaughter (2) slave (8) sleep (1) slow (2) Smoke (3) social (24) society (56) socio-politico-economic system (25) sorcery (1) Soul (71) sound (5) source (7) South Africa (1) South America (1) sovereignty (15) space (2) Spain (5) speak (2) speech (5) spell (1) Spider (1) Spiritual (100) Splitting (2) Spoils (1) spouse (4) Sri Lanka (1) stages (5) Stars (7) Start (3) State (36) steadfast (3) Stingy (2) stoning (3) Story (2) strategy (20) strength (1) Striking (4) strive (15) Strong (4) struggle (36) Stubborn (2) student (1) study (49) Suad (1) Subdue (2) submission (13) submit (2) Success (12) Sudan (1) sufi (3) suicide (1) Sulaiman (13) Sumayyah (2) summon (2) Sun (4) Sunnah (38) Sunrise (4) sunset (3) superiority (3) superstition (1) supplication (4) Supreme (5) Surah (129) Sure (3) Suriname (1) surrender (6) suspicion (2) Sustainer (4) sustenance (5) Swearing (1) sword (7) Sydney (1) symbol (2) synthesis (1) Syria (8) system (15) Taahaa (1) Taara (1) Tabari (1) Table (1) Tableegh (24) Tabriz (1) Tabuk (1) Tabyeen (3) tadabbur (6) Tahajjud (1) Taif (3) Tajweed (5) Takbeer (1) Tanzania (1) taqwa (15) Taraweeh (2) tarteel (7) Tatar (1) taubah (1) Tauheed (1) Tawaf (2) tazakkur (5) teachings (48) Tear Out (1) technology (3) Tehreek-e-Shaheedain (2) temptation (6) terrorists (11) Test (13) testify (7) Thailand (1) Thamud (2) Thankful (6) theft (1) think (27) Thomas Carlyle (2) Those Who Runs (3) throne (11) Thunder (2) tilawat (4) Timbuktu (1) Time (51) Tokyo (1) tolerance (1) tone (2) Tongue (4) Torah (14) Toronto (1) touch (1) Tract (1) trade (3) traditions of Prophet Muhammad (14) training (1) traits (1) transcendental (9) transgression (3) Translation (15) traveling (1) Treaty (3) Tree (3) Trench (1) trials (6) Tribe (10) Trust (10) Truth (84) try (1) Tunisia (1) Tur (1) Turkestan (1) Turkey (12) Turkmenistan (2) Turks (2) Twilight (1) UAE (1) Uganda (1) Uhud (4) Ulu Cami (1) Ummah (50) understand (277) Unique (13) unite (9) Universe (21) unseen (10) USA (2) Uzbekistan (4) values (10) vanity (2) Vedas (1) veil (3) Venezuela (1) verse (13) vicegerent (4) Victory (5) Vietnam (1) vigilant (1) violence (5) virtues (6) vision (9) Visitor (1) voice (2) Wait (2) wajib (2) Wall (3) wantonness (2) waqi'a (1) War (21) Warning (27) Washington (1) water (1) Way (3) Weakness (2) wealth (9) weapon (1) western (17) wife (10) Will (10) William Draper (1) Wind (4) Wisdom (21) Wise Man (3) Witness (17) Wives (5) Women (51) words (14) workers (2) World (36) worries (1) worship (34) Wrapped (2) Wrath (4) wrong (9) Wudhu (4) Xian (1) Yaqoob (2) Yasin (1) Yassir (2) Yathrib (1) Yaum (1) year (3) Yemen (5) young (2) Yusuf (4) zakat (15) Zambia (1) Zilzal (1)