Can Muslims Vote in Elections of the Modern Secular State?
THE WORLD-ORDER TODAY
THE MYSTERY OF THE MODERN SECULAR
STATE
MERITS
OF THE MODERN SECULAR STATE
SHIRK
AND KUFR IN THE MODERN SECULAR STATE
THE
CALIPHATE AND THE MODERN SECULAR STATE
QUR’ANIC
EXPLANATION FOR THE UNIVERSAL SHIRK OF THE MODERN SECULAR STATE
ALTERNATIVE TO ELECTORAL POLITICS OF THE MODERN SECULAR STATE
The Jewish, Christian or Muslim
reader is likely to ask: Is there an alternative (for believers) to electoral
politics in the secular state? Yes, there is!
The alternative is
– to struggle to restore the sovereignty of the One God in the political system
– to struggle for recognition of His Authority as Supreme Authority and
– to struggle for recognition of His Law as the Supreme Law.
That is the highest and noblest of all political struggles any one can ever wage, and it is a struggle that must be pursued until the end of time. Indeed Allah, Most High, has guaranteed that time cannot end before that struggle ultimately succeeds.
The alternative is
– to struggle to restore the sovereignty of the One God in the political system
– to struggle for recognition of His Authority as Supreme Authority and
– to struggle for recognition of His Law as the Supreme Law.
That is the highest and noblest of all political struggles any one can ever wage, and it is a struggle that must be pursued until the end of time. Indeed Allah, Most High, has guaranteed that time cannot end before that struggle ultimately succeeds.
The alternative for believers is to
uphold whatever Allah made Halal as Halal, and whatever Allah made Haram as
Haram, regardless of the price they may have to pay. Also, when a people commit
Shirk, Kufr, Dhulm and Fisq, then believers should condemn such conduct, oppose
it, struggle against it, and turn to Allah and ask Him to separate them from
such people:
“ . . . So separate us from this sinful rebellious people!” (Qur’an, al-Maidah, 5:28)
“ . . . So separate us from this sinful rebellious people!” (Qur’an, al-Maidah, 5:28)
The Qur’an refers to this mission of
believers as “amr bil ma’aruf” (enjoining the right) and “nahi ‘an al-munkar”
(opposing the wrong). If the struggle to restore the sovereignty of Allah Most
High and the supremacy of His Authority and Law (in any territory) were to
succeed, then that territory would become Dar al-Islam. Muslims would rule over
that territory. But there is an alternative model of a plural state in which
Muslims would share control over a territory with non-Muslims on the basis of
political equality and through a constitutional agreement that would allow
Muslims to recognize the sovereignty of Allah and the supremacy of His Authority
and Law over ‘them’. Prophet Muhammad (sallalahu ‘alaihi wa sallam) established
that model of state in the city-state of Madina wherein Muslims, Jews and pagan
Arabs shared control over territory and over the state on the basis of
political equality.
Mankind has the freedom of choice to
accept or to reject the religion of Abraham (‘alaihi al-Salam). However, once
the religion of Abraham (‘alaihi al-Salam) is accepted, believers do not have
the freedom to choose between a government of believers or a non-believing
government. So long as believers have the freedom to do so, they must choose
fellow-believers to rule over them. When they are denied that freedom in any
territory they must search for some place where that freedom exists and then
migrate to such a territory! Thus the God of Abraham, Most High, has commanded
believers to: “Oh you who
believe, obey Allah, and obey the Messenger, and (obey) those from amongst
yourselves who are in (positions of) authority. . . " (Qur’an, al-Nisa, 4:59)
When they no longer have the freedom
to establish their own government anywhere, and they have to live under
non-believing rule, believers in the religion of Abraham (‘alaihi al-Salam)
‘submit’ to that rule until such time as they can once again choose
fellow-believers to rule over them. But ‘submission’ to such non-believing rule
cannot involve their participation in establishing that non-believing
government. Secondly, believers submit to such rule on the condition of
religious freedom, i.e., that nothing is forced upon them that violates the Law
of the God of Abraham. Such a law would be, for example the religious
obligation to fight (al-Qital) and hence to receive military training!
While such a government will not be
‘their’ government, they can advise and assist the government in all that is
true, good and virtuous, while warning, resisting and abstaining from all that
is false, evil and harmful. Herein lies the most important political role of
Muslims in the politics of Trinidad and Tobago.
It is in the very nature of the
modern secular state that it would never allow elections to be used to
transform it into a different model of a state – such as a state that would
recognize the Sovereignty of the God of Abraham (‘alaihi al-Salam) and the
supremacy of His Authority and His Law. Electoral politics must function
subservient to the godless secular state.
The Prophet (sallalahu ‘alaihi wa
sallam) declared that the world of Kufr constituted an essential unity
(al-kufru millatun wahidah). This is precisely what has now emerged in the
world. The Jews and the Christians should ponder over the fact that when the
Muslims of Algeria used ‘electoral politics’ to seek to restore the religion of
Abraham (‘alaihi al-Salam) in Algeria and won 85% of the votes in the national
elections, the godless world all came together to ruthlessly punish that 85% of
the electorate which dared to seek to transform the godless secular foundation
of the state. The merciless and shameless rape of Algeria by the entire godless
secular world still continues even years after that unfortunate election.
Thus, rather than voting in elections
and legitimizing the secular model of a state based on Shirk, Muslims should
protect themselves from Shirk by disconnecting from the secular state. They
should also respond to it by arguing that the model of a state established by
Prophet Muhammad (sallalahu ‘alaihi wa sallam) is a superior model when
compared with the godless secular state. The alternative to the political Shirk
of the secular state and its electoral politics must also be an alternative
that would save Muslims from the Riba of the modern economy. That Riba is
bringing upon all of mankind a new sophisticated slavery. Muslims also need an
alternative to the moral corruption that is descending upon all of mankind.
Perhaps the most dangerous of all evils from which Muslims must flee is an
educational system that secularizes knowledge and education and, in so doing,
produces people who are internally, spiritually blind.
There is only one road through which
Muslims can preserve their faith in the world today and that road is given in
Surah al-Kahf of the Qur’an (the Surah which protects from Dajjal). It is to
disconnect from the godless world, i.e., to ‘drop out’.The Qur’an itself directs the Muslim
to disconnect from the godless world:
“ . . . So separate us from this sinful rebellious people!” (Qur’an, al-Maidah, 5:28)
“ . . . So separate us from this sinful rebellious people!” (Qur’an, al-Maidah, 5:28)
THE MUSLIM VILLAGE
CONCLUSION
to be continued . . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment